Archive for the 'Observationalisms' Category

Causation Vs. Coincidence

I was trying to call a friend of mine an hour or so ago and the voice dialing software on my iPhone interpereted my “call <friend name>, mobile” request for “call mom, home.” I didn’t realize it until she answered. The mistake turned in to an hour long conversation about some things that have been going on in the last couple of days for her. Without getting in to details, she just happened to be in a bit of a sticky situation and needed a listening ear and a little bit of advice.
As an aside, I do have to say it’s an honor to be able to give my own mother advice. She has a tendency to worry things she can’t change or to let a situation become more emotional than it should be, hence clouding her judgment. Yes I am aware that women are typically more emotional creatures than men. I understand that and I took it in to consideration while typing that. But, back to the story…
I was able to listen and give some objective feedback on the whole situation and she seemed to genuinely appreciate the advice I gave her. She even said she was going to try it! Thanks for humoring me, mom!
I gave her some tips on thinking about things objectively; visualize, analyze, reason, then act. I even suggested a few minutes of stream of consciousness writing to help her with the “analyze” part. One of the things I strive for every day is to be objective and I tend to promote that to those around me for solving life-problems. But all of that is neither, here nor there. I really wanted to talk about what happened before the iPhone malfunction.
There’s something in particular I find intriguing about causation. For some reason, I can’t seem to grasp it entirely due to it’s built-in property of “going on forever”Causation and Chaos tend to be tightly wound in my mind, and if anyone reading this is a “real” (i.e. formally trained and practicing) philosopher who knows about the two ideas, please comment (constructively and objectively). I’m no expert on either so all of what I’m saying is still quite elementary. I digress…
Since the rule applies, that, “in order for something to happen, something had to happen before it” you end up with a nasty problem on your hands; this is known as “cause and effect.” We are swimming in a vast sea teeming with causality. You’re reading this as a result of clicking, typing, or copy/pasting the URL. You own a computer right now as a result of buying one. You bought one as a result of the need/desire for one. You needed/desired a computer because of something which is the result of something else, and so on. This is a weak abstraction, but I think you get the picture. Essentially, event En cannot occur until E(…n-1) have come and gone. Simple concept when you break it down this way. But think about all of the things that happen in the world. Right now as you read this, there is a high probability that someone in your town is having sex, or breaking the speed limit, or contemplating suicide, or smoking marijuana, or dancing, or laughing, or giving birth, or sitting through a green light on accident, or drinking coffee (mine is delicious by the way), or even Googling “causation” and about to stumble across this very same blog post. Every effect is, essentially, also a cause. It also seems that this property is required (a law of causality?) for causation to function. Without an effect, there was no cause, and no cause can be a cause without causing something.
It feels like there is a problem here, but I can’t put my finger on it yet. I’ll do some thinking before I go any further in to all of that.
“Where are you going with this, man!?” Okay, okay, sorry. I’ve said a lot but haven’t gotten to my point yet so here it goes.
Go under the notion we just derived that an effect cannot exist without a cause and that cause is merely a property of effect. This is exclusive in terms of coincidence. Coincidence is a perception of an event (chock it up to wishful thinking or rationality) being something more than it is.
Hard to disregard that some times though.


I don’t claim to be an expert in any fields so don’t read my blog as if I am one. I’m just an explorer looking for answers and I welcome constructive and objective responses.
- John
  • Share/Bookmark

Cyclical Linear Desensitization

I’ve been forumlating a concept that I call Cyclical Linear Desensitization. It desribes the loop of step-by-step, non-varying events that lead to a total or partial psychological numbing to all or most experiences.

I’ll be posting more on this later, I just wanted everyone to know I was still here and thinking.

- john

  • Share/Bookmark

True to life joke: If People Bought Cars Like They Buy Computers

If People Bought Cars Like They Buy Computers.

Read the joke linked above before continuing.

OK. Now that you’ve absorbed that and maybe giggled a bit, the reason this is being mentioned is that it rings so TRUE. Truth makes comedy work.

What I don’t understand, and what I would like SOMEONE to adequately explain to me is this: Why do poeple who are otherwise reasonably intelligent people (anyone from a high school graduate to a doctoral degree holder) feel that it is ok to turn into blithering idiots when presented with anything remotely tech in nature? It is one thing to not understand how C++, Visual Basic, or Java might be structured and written, but it is all to often that a support technician answer a phone and the problem is that the person doesn’t know how to press in the button clearly marked with “Power” or they didn’t plug in the COLORED cable into the SAME COLOR port. I’ve taken these calls. What’s worse is I’ve been face to face with these people. It is culturally acceptable for someone to spout the mantra “I am computer [technology] illiterate” and expect everything to be fine.

Oh, but woe to the person who can’t GRASP the simplified explanations that they give for their “easy” jobs, like say, gastric bypass surgery. God forbid I don’t understand something I don’t intend to come into contact with on a daily basis, but you feel that I shouldn’t mention to anyone in your waiting room how you regularly need to call me to find out why your “magic picture box” doesn’t show you things when the lights flicker because you didn’t use one of those “battery thingies” I keep saying you need to buy.

Honestly folks, I’m not bitter. I swear!

  • Share/Bookmark

The impact of a single statement…

Sometimes you see a quote so profound that you must share. I didn’t find the post itself that profound (you can find it here, The French Method – :: LEAST I COULD DO FORUM ::, and decide for yourself), but the poster, Ryan Sohmer, ended with a quote that came from The Wonder Years:

“When you’re a little kid you’re a bit of everything; Scientist, Philosopher, Artist. Sometimes it seems like growing up is giving these things up one at a time.”

It struck me as a very true idea and it makes me sad that so many poeple find it neccessary to let go of so much to “grow up”. I believe the world would be a much better place if we looked through the eyes of babes every now and then to remember how wonderous the world really is.

  • Share/Bookmark

A few words on…

**Warning: If you do not like to read, skip to long story short below!**

It struck me today how odd individual human perception is, in broad terms, of course. What struck me was that someone mentioned to me about a bicentennial. He got mixed up and said that the country’s bicentennial will be next year, which he immediately realized he misspoke. Not a big deal, but it got me to analyzing my own perception of our government. I was born after the bicentennial had passed for our nation. As such, I have never been witness to a major event marking the age of our country. This may our may not contribute to the following perception as realized today.

I realized that I had a general perception of our country as having always been here due to that its state was established for as long as I have been self aware. As such, without specific reference, to my general consciousness, our country is equal to all other established governments that were established prior to my awareness. This is odd because I have academic awareness that our country is young in comparrison to others. I just have to put an effort (albeit a small effort) into this realization in my thought process. This is not limited to national awareness, however. This also is reflected in my awareness of other people and things around me such as parents, houses, et cetera. Without thinking specifically of their age, my parents and grandparents are equal to me. They were here before me. It is as if rudementary thought processes group items into “here before me” and “younger than me.” This also gives a certain perception of agelessness to the concepts in question.

What is the point here, you may ask? What is the application of this idea?

Well, if you consider that this may be a phenomenon shared amongst many if not all peoples, it would explain many a national superiority complex. It also helps explains why many are upset and confused by the loss of older loved ones.

Of course it could just a personal phenomenon due to my own thought processes which are very often different than most others. If you read this, please look into your own perceptions and share your thoughts. For those readers out there, the long story short is a lie. Nobody “did it.”

Long Story Short:

The son’s friend’s second cousin did it.

  • Share/Bookmark



All content © (copyright) 2008 of respective poster.